terraform

History

Sarah French c05eaaf20d PSS: Refactor how we handle unmanaged providers, add support for using dev_override (#38269 ) * feat: Enable use of developer override providers when using PSS * feat: Store how a provider was supplied to Terraform in the backend state file. This allows triggering a prompt for state migration if there's a change between using a managed provider versus an unmanaged/override provider. * test: Update all PSS-related backend state files in test fixtures to include new, necessary provider_supply_mode data. * fix: Avoid duplicate dev_override warnings * refactor: Change how we determine how a provider is supplied to Terraform. By using supply mode data we prevent multiple parts of the code checking if a given provider is reattached/builtin/etc... * test: Add separate tests showing a built-in or dev override provider being used for the main workflow using PSS * test: Add E2E tests that characterise current behaviour when how a provider is supplied is changed partway through different workflows * fix: Tolerate missing default workspace when using PSS and init handles minor changes in state store configuration. * feat: `init`-related code will prompt a user to migrate state if Terraform detects a swap between managed and unmanaged providers being used for PSS. Internally, what happens is the different version data (null versus a value being present) impacts the hash of the state store. This then triggers logic where TF checks if a migration is needed or if the new hash value should be silently updated in the backend state file. We always prompt for migration. * refactor: Add `NotManagedByTerraform` method to `ProviderSupplyMode` * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Radek Simko <radeksimko@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Radek Simko <radeksimko@users.noreply.github.com>		1 week ago
..
.terraform	PSS: Refactor how we handle unmanaged providers, add support for using dev_override (#38269 )	1 week ago
.terraform.lock.hcl	…
main.tf	…