1 Commits (dc0fee96ef4672f14e5dd4458895c3a514b2082a)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Sarah French	f591872699	PSS: Allow pluggable state store configuration to be stored in a plan file (#37956) ... * refactor: Rename Meta's backendState field to backendConfigState This helps with navigating ambiguity around the word backend. The new name should indicate that the value represents a `backend` block, not a more general interpretation of what a backend is. * fix: Only set backendConfigState to synthetic object if it's nil due to a lack of data. Don't change it if pluggable state storage is in use. * feat: Enable recording a state store's details in an Operation, and using that data when creating a plan file. * fix: Include provider config when writing a plan file using pluggable state storage * fix: Having `backendConfigState` be nil may be valid, but it definitely isn't valid for `stateStoreConfigState` to be nil When backendConfigState is nil it means that an implied local backend is in use, i.e. there is no backend block in the config. * test: Add integration test showing that a plan command creates a plan file with the expected state_store configuration data * refactor: Apply suggestion from @radeksimko Co-authored-by: Radek Simko <radeksimko@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: Allow panics to occur if an unexpected implementation of `backend.Backend` is encountered when managing a state store * docs: Add code comment explaining the current situation with passing backend config state to downstream logic. In future this should be simplified, either via refactoring or changes affecting the implied local backend --------- Co-authored-by: Radek Simko <radeksimko@users.noreply.github.com>	4 months ago