7 Commits (bf396b5f1b89536725a3be35d7500a17cb1045b3)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Alisdair McDiarmid	5e30d58dc2	command/jsonplan: Add output change sensitivity ... When an output value changes, we have a small amount of information we can convey about its sensitivity. If either the output was previously marked sensitive, or is currently marked sensitive in the config, this is tracked in the output change data. This commit encodes this boolean in the change struct's `before_sensitive` and `after_sensitive` fields, in the a way which matches resource value sensitivity. Since we have so little information to work with, these two values will always be booleans, and always equal each. This is logically consistent with how else we want to obscure sensitive data: a changing output which was or is marked sensitive should not have the value shown in human-readable output.	5 years ago
Alisdair McDiarmid	e27aacebf9	command/jsonplan: Add sensitive value mapping data ... Similar to `after_unknown`, `before_sensitive` and `after_sensitive` are values with similar structure to `before` and `after` which encode the presence of sensitive values in a planned change. These should be used to obscure sensitive values from human-readable output. These values follow the same structure as the `before` and `after` values, replacing sensitive values with `true`, and non-sensitive values with `false`. Following the `after_unknown` precedent, we omit non-sensitive `false` values for object attributes/map values, to make serialization more compact. One difference from `after_unknown` is that a sensitive complex value (collection or structural type) is replaced with `true`. If the complex value itself is sensitive, all of its contents should be obscured.	5 years ago
James Bardin	3b3ff98356	Revert "fix show -json tests" ... This reverts commit e54949f2e1. Changes incorrectly applied to the planned state tests	6 years ago
James Bardin	e54949f2e1	fix show -json tests ... The prior state recorded in the plans did not match the actual prior state. Make the plans and state match depending on whether there was existing state or not.	6 years ago
Kristin Laemmert	27a794062e	Mildwonkey/command tests (#24535) ... * command: refactor testBackendState to write states.State testBackendState was using the older terraform.State format, which is no longer sufficient for most tests since the state upgrader does not encode provider FQNs automatically. Users will run `terraform 0.13upgrade` to update their state to include provider FQNs in resources, but tests need to use the modern state format instead of relying on the automatic upgrade. * plan tests passing * graph tests passing * json packages test update * command test updates * update show test fixtures * state show tests passing	6 years ago
Kristin Laemmert	47a16b0937	addrs: embed Provider in AbsProviderConfig instead of Type ... a large refactor to addrs.AbsProviderConfig, embedding the addrs.Provider instead of a Type string. I've added and updated tests, added some Legacy functions to support older state formats and shims, and added a normalization step when reading v4 (current) state files (not the added tests under states/statefile/roundtrip which work with both current and legacy-style AbsProviderConfig strings). The remaining 'fixme' and 'todo' comments are mostly going to be addressed in a subsequent PR and involve looking up a given local provider config's FQN. This is fine for now as we are only working with default assumption.	6 years ago
Radek Simko	5b9f2fafc8	Standardise directory name for test data	7 years ago