9 Commits (94de72c63834acea811c27a585c19eae29374a4b)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Martin Atkins	4cffff24b1	core: Report reason for deferring data read until apply ... We have two different reasons why a data resource might be read only during apply, rather than during planning as usual: the configuration contains unknown values, or the data resource as a whole depends on a managed resource which itself has a change pending. However, we didn't previously distinguish these two in a way that allowed the UI to describe the difference, and so we confusingly reported both as "config refers to values not yet known", which in turn led to a number of reasonable questions about why Terraform was claiming that but then immediately below showing the configuration entirely known. Now we'll use our existing "ActionReason" mechanism to tell the UI layer which of the two reasons applies to a particular data resource instance. The "dependency pending" situation tends to happen in conjunction with "config unknown", so we'll prefer to refer that the configuration is unknown if both are true.	4 years ago
James Bardin	e4c4dcbd14	add ResourceInstanceReplaceByTriggers	4 years ago
James Bardin	91121aa856	limit replace_triggered_by to same module instance ... replace_triggered_by references are scoped to the current module, so we need to filter changes for the current module instance. Rather than creating a ConfigResource and filtering the result, make a Changes.InstancesForAbsResource method to get only the AbsResource changes.	4 years ago
James Bardin	0e7cec83db	decode change before creating diff ... This is functionally equivalent, but will allow us to filter the change values directly for reduced drift output.	4 years ago
Martin Atkins	a1a713cf28	core: Report ActionReasons when we plan to delete "orphans" ... There are a few different reasons why a resource instance tracked in the prior state might be considered an "orphan", but previously we reported them all identically in the planned changes. In order to help users understand the reason for a surprising planned delete, we'll now try to specify an additional reason for the planned deletion, covering all of the main reasons why that could happen. This commit only introduces the new detail to the plans.Changes result, though it also incidentally exposes it as part of the JSON plan result in order to keep that working without returning errors in these new cases. We'll expose this information in the human-oriented UI output in a subsequent commit.	5 years ago
Alisdair McDiarmid	29999c1d6f	command: Render "moved" annotations in plan UI ... For resources which are planned to move, render the previous run address as additional information in the plan UI. For the case of a move-only resource (which otherwise is unchanged), we also render that as a planned change, but without any corresponding action symbol. If all changes in the plan are moves without changes, the plan is no longer considered "empty". In this case, we skip rendering the action symbols in the UI.	5 years ago
Martin Atkins	22b36d1f4c	Field for the previous address of each resource instance in the plan ... In order to expose the effect of any relevant "moved" statements we dealt with prior to creating the plan, we'll record with each ResourceInstanceChange both is current address and the address it was tracked at for the previous run. To save consumers of these objects from having to special-case the situation where there _was_ no previous run (e.g. because this is a Create change), we'll just pretend the previous run address was the same as the current address in that case, the same as for an update without any renaming in effect. This includes a breaking change to the plan file format, but one that doesn't require a version number increment because there is no ambiguity between the two formats and so mismatched parsers will already fail with an error message. As of this commit we've just added the new field but not yet populated it with any useful information: it always just matches Addr. A future commit will wire this up to the result of applying the moves so that we can populate it correctly. We also don't yet expose this new information anywhere in the UI layer.	5 years ago
Martin Atkins	f40800b3a4	Move states/ to internal/states/ ... This is part of a general effort to move all of Terraform's non-library package surface under internal in order to reinforce that these are for internal use within Terraform only. If you were previously importing packages under this prefix into an external codebase, you could pin to an earlier release tag as an interim solution until you've make a plan to achieve the same functionality some other way.	5 years ago
Martin Atkins	034e944070	Move plans/ to internal/plans/ ... This is part of a general effort to move all of Terraform's non-library package surface under internal in order to reinforce that these are for internal use within Terraform only. If you were previously importing packages under this prefix into an external codebase, you could pin to an earlier release tag as an interim solution until you've make a plan to achieve the same functionality some other way.	5 years ago