15 Commits (6bbfbab93ec63b0d4f385c2e2d97b60e2ef9288c)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Laura Martin	6e1e614a56	Change -force to -auto-approve when destroying ... Since an early version of Terraform, the `destroy` command has always had the `-force` flag to allow an auto approval of the interactive prompt. 0.11 introduced `-auto-approve` as default to `false` when using the `apply` command. The `-auto-approve` flag was introduced to reduce ambiguity of it's function, but the `-force` flag was never updated for a destroy. People often use wrappers when automating commands in Terraform, and the inconsistency between `apply` and `destroy` means that additional logic must be added to the wrappers to do similar functions. Both commands are more or less able to run with similar syntax, and also heavily share their code. This commit updates the command in `destroy` to use the `-auto-approve` flag making working with the Terraform CLI a more consistent experience. We leave in `-force` in `destroy` for the time-being and flag it as deprecated to ensure a safe switchover period.	8 years ago
Martin Atkins	d4ee58ce59	Re-integrate the "terraform" provider into the main binary ... As part of the 0.10 core/provider split we moved this provider, along with all the others, out into its own repository. In retrospect, the "terraform" provider doesn't really make sense to be separated since it's just a thin wrapper around some core code anyway, and so re-integrating it into core avoids the confusion that results when Terraform Core and the terraform provider have inconsistent versions of the backend code and dependencies. There is no good reason to use a different version of the backend code in the provider than in core, so this new "internal provider" mechanism is stricter than the old one: it's not possible to use an external build of this provider at all, and version constraints for it are rejected as a result. This provider is also run in-process rather than in a child process, since again it's just a very thin wrapper around code that's already running in Terraform core anyway, and so the process barrier between the two does not create enough advantage to warrant the additional complexity.	8 years ago
Martin Atkins	400038eda4	command: "terraform apply" uses interactive confirmation by default ... In the 0.10 release we added an opt-in mode where Terraform would prompt interactively for confirmation during apply. We made this opt-in to give those who wrap Terraform in automation some time to update their scripts to explicitly opt out of this behavior where appropriate. Here we switch the default so that a "terraform apply" with no arguments will -- if it computes a non-empty diff -- display the diff and wait for the user to type "yes" in similar vein to the "terraform destroy" command. This makes the commonly-used "terraform apply" a safe workflow for interactive use, so "terraform plan" is now mainly for use in automation where a separate planning step is used. The apply command remains non-interactive when given an explicit plan file. The previous behavior -- though not recommended -- can be obtained by explicitly setting the -auto-approve option on the apply command line, and indeed that is how all of the tests are updated here so that they can continue to run non-interactively.	8 years ago
James Bardin	53c8c1e208	e2e test for `init -from-module` ... Pull down the hashicorp/vault/aws module into the current directory with init.	8 years ago
Martin Atkins	5347f82f9a	command: Include provider versions in "terraform version" ... We encourage users to share the "terraform version" output as part of filing an issue, but previously it only printed the core Terraform version and this left provider maintainers with no information about which _provider_ version an issue relates to. Here we make a best effort to show versions for providers, though we will omit some or all of them if either "terraform init" hasn't been run (and so no providers were selected yet) or if there are other inconsistencies that would cause Terraform to object on startup and require a re-run of "terraform init".	8 years ago
Martin Atkins	34cecfa839	command/e2etest: fix incorrect "terraform version" test ... Two different errors here caused this test to pass even though it was incorrect: the wanted version string was incorrect, but the test for it was also inverted, and so together this made the test pass even though it was actually not testing the output at all.	8 years ago
Martin Atkins	30e6f4e066	command/e2etest: test installation of plugins from cache ... This is a tough one to unit tests because the behavior is tangled up in the code that hits releases.hashicorp.com, so we'll add this e2etest as some extra insurance that this works end-to-end.	9 years ago
Martin Atkins	73d1298572	command/e2etest: test the "running in automation" workflow ... Since we now have a guide that recommends some specific ways to run Terraform in automation, we can mimic those suggestions in an e2e test and thus ensure they keep working. Here we test the three different approaches suggested in the guide: - init, plan, apply (main case) - init, apply (e.g. for deploying to a QA/staging environment) - init, plan (e.g. for verifying a pull request)	9 years ago
Martin Atkins	cb6d4e5f20	command/e2etest: fix TestPrimarySeparatePlan test ... In 6712192724 we stopped counting data source destroys in the destroy tally since they are an implementation detail. This caused this test to start failing, though since the new behavior is correct here we just update the test to match.	9 years ago
Martin Atkins	c12d64f340	Use t.Helper() in our test helpers ... Go 1.9 adds this new function which, when called, marks the caller as being a "helper function". Helper function stack frames are then skipped when trying to find a line of test code to blame for a test failure, so that the code in the main test function appears in the test failure output rather than a line within the helper function itself. This covers many -- but probaly not all -- of our test helpers across various packages.	9 years ago
Radek Simko	9e7e4ff4fb	e2e: Decouple logic for running e2e tests	9 years ago
Martin Atkins	23f9c8785e	command/e2etest: an initial test for the primary workflow ... This e2etest runs an init, plan, apply, destroy sequence against a test configuration using the real template and null providers downloaded from the official repository. This test _does_ trample a bit on the scope of some already-existing tests, but this is mainly just to check our assumptions about how Terraform behaves to ensure that we can reach our main conclusion here: that the main Terraform workflow commands interact correctly with each other in real use and we can complete the full workflow.	9 years ago
Martin Atkins	52df81ee49	command/e2etest: test that we can install provider plugins ... We already have good tests for the business logic around provider installation, but the existing tests all stub out the main repository server. This test completes that coverage by verifying that the installer is able to run against the real repository and install an official release of the template provider.	9 years ago
Martin Atkins	0e0b0d125a	command/e2etest: "terraform version" test ... This basic test is here primarily because it's one of the few that can run without reaching out to external services, and so it means our usual test runs will catch situations where the main executable build is somehow broken. The version command itself is not very interesting to test, but it's convenient in that its behavior is very predictable and self-contained.	9 years ago
Martin Atkins	fee61a44b4	command/e2etest: end-to-end testing harness ... Previously we had no automated testing of whether we can produce a Terraform executable that actually works. Our various functional tests have good coverage of specific Terraform features and whole operations, but we lacked end-to-end testing of actual usage of the generated binary, without any stubbing. This package is intended as a vehicle for such end-to-end testing. When run normally under "go test" it will produce a build of the main Terraform binary and make it available for tests to execute. The harness exposes a flag for whether tests are allowed to reach out to external network services, controlled with our standard TF_ACC environment variable, so that basic local tests can be safely run as part of "make test" while more elaborate tests can be run easily when desired. It also provides a separate mode of operation where the included script make-archive.sh can be used to produce a self-contained test archive that can be copied to another system to run the tests there. This is intended to allow testing of cross-compiled binaries, by shipping them over to the target OS and architecture to run without requiring a full Go compiler installation on the target system. The goal here is not to test again functionality that's already well-covered by our existing tests, but rather to test chains of normal operations against the build binary that are not otherwise tested together.	9 years ago