16 Commits (654acb7ddda17f0cd504f2362aaba043cc5c91bc)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Martin Atkins	654acb7ddd	command: Fix TestApply_destroyTargeted for new provider and state types	8 years ago
Martin Atkins	46b0286b30	command: Fix TestApply_destroy for new provider and state types	8 years ago
Martin Atkins	ade3b4575e	terraform: Ugly huge change to weave in new State and Plan types ... Due to how often the state and plan types are referenced throughout Terraform, there isn't a great way to switch them out gradually. As a consequence, this huge commit gets us from the old world to a _compilable_ new world, but still has a large number of known test failures due to key functionality being stubbed out. The stubs here are for anything that interacts with providers, since we now need to do the follow-up work to similarly replace the old terraform.ResourceProvider interface with its replacement in the new "providers" package. That work, along with work to fix the remaining failing tests, will follow in subsequent commits. The aim here was to replace all references to terraform.State and its downstream types with states.State, terraform.Plan with plans.Plan, state.State with statemgr.State, and switch to the new implementations of the state and plan file formats. However, due to the number of times those types are used, this also ended up affecting numerous other parts of core such as terraform.Hook, the backend.Backend interface, and most of the CLI commands. Just as with 5861dbf3fc before, I apologize in advance to the person who inevitably just found this huge commit while spelunking through the commit history.	8 years ago
Martin Atkins	a98d25f41d	move "configschema" from "config" to "configs" ... The "config" package is no longer used and will be removed as part of the 0.12 release cleanup. Since configschema is part of the "new world" of configuration modelling, it makes more sense for it to live as a subdirectory of the newer "configs" package.	8 years ago
Martin Atkins	456e105155	command: Update tests for changes in "terraform" package ... This is not exhaustive, but it gets the tests in this package compiling again and gets most of them working.	8 years ago
Laura Martin	6e1e614a56	Change -force to -auto-approve when destroying ... Since an early version of Terraform, the `destroy` command has always had the `-force` flag to allow an auto approval of the interactive prompt. 0.11 introduced `-auto-approve` as default to `false` when using the `apply` command. The `-auto-approve` flag was introduced to reduce ambiguity of it's function, but the `-force` flag was never updated for a destroy. People often use wrappers when automating commands in Terraform, and the inconsistency between `apply` and `destroy` means that additional logic must be added to the wrappers to do similar functions. Both commands are more or less able to run with similar syntax, and also heavily share their code. This commit updates the command in `destroy` to use the `-auto-approve` flag making working with the Terraform CLI a more consistent experience. We leave in `-force` in `destroy` for the time-being and flag it as deprecated to ensure a safe switchover period.	8 years ago
Martin Atkins	8364383c35	Push plugin discovery down into command package ... Previously we did plugin discovery in the main package, but as we move towards versioned plugins we need more information available in order to resolve plugins, so we move this responsibility into the command package itself. For the moment this is just preserving the existing behavior as long as there are only internal and unversioned plugins present. This is the final state for provisioners in 0.10, since we don't want to support versioned provisioners yet. For providers this is just a checkpoint along the way, since further work is required to apply version constraints from configuration and support additional plugin search directories. The automatic plugin discovery behavior is not desirable for tests because we want to mock the plugins there, so we add a new backdoor for the tests to use to skip the plugin discovery and just provide their own mock implementations. Most of this diff is thus noisy rework of the tests to use this new mechanism.	9 years ago
James Bardin	ec00564be6	Clean up LockInfo and LockError and use them ... Gove LockInfo a Marshal method for easy serialization, and a String method for more readable output. Have the state.Locker implementations use LockError when possible to return LockInfo and an error.	9 years ago
James Bardin	f2e496a14c	Have backend operations properly unlock state ... Make sure unlock is called with the correct LockID during operations	9 years ago
James Bardin	b80ae5e13e	Add source path argument to testLockState ... The new test pattern is to chdir into a temp location for the test, but the prevents us from locating the testdata directory in the source. Add a source path to testLockState so we can find the statelocker.go source.	9 years ago
James Bardin	82e59cd826	Add test for destroy with locked state	9 years ago
Mitchell Hashimoto	785cc7b78a	terraform: default new graphs on, old graphs behind -Xlegacy-graph ... This turns the new graphs on by default and puts the old graphs behind a flag `-Xlegacy-graph`. This effectively inverts the current 0.7.x behavior with the new graphs. We've incubated most of these for a few weeks now. We've found issues and we've fixed them and we've been using these graphs internally for awhile without any major issue. Its time to default them on and get them part of a beta.	10 years ago
Anthony Scalisi	198e1a5186	remove various typos	11 years ago
Paul Hinze	97acccd3ed	core: targeted operations ... Add `-target=resource` flag to core operations, allowing users to target specific resources in their infrastructure. When `-target` is used, the operation will only apply to that resource and its dependencies. The calculated dependencies are different depending on whether we're running a normal operation or a `terraform destroy`. Generally, "dependencies" refers to ancestors: resources falling _before_ the target in the graph, because their changes are required to accurately act on the target. For destroys, "dependencies" are descendents: those resources which fall _after_ the target. These resources depend on our target, which is going to be destroyed, so they should also be destroyed.	11 years ago
Mitchell Hashimoto	a5f70ead2d	command: destroy should ask for confirmation always	12 years ago
Mitchell Hashimoto	ab9dd71bcb	command/destroy: first steps	12 years ago