8 Commits (5e2b11657e82b7a7e239ff695c68795d883a4b4e)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Martin Atkins	7caf0b9246	addrs: ImpliedProviderForUnqualifiedType function ... This encapsulates the logic for selecting an implied FQN for an unqualified type name, which could either come from a local name used in a module without specifying an explicit source for it or from the prefix of a resource type on a resource that doesn't explicitly set "provider". This replaces the previous behavior of just directly calling NewDefaultProvider everywhere so that we can use a different implication for the local name "terraform", to refer to the built-in terraform provider rather than the stale one that's on registry.terraform.io for compatibility with other Terraform versions.	6 years ago
Martin Atkins	4061cbed38	internal/getproviders: A new shared model for provider requirements ... We've been using the models from the "moduledeps" package to represent our provider dependencies everywhere since the idea of provider dependencies was introduced in Terraform 0.10, but that model is not convenient to use for any use-case other than the "terraform providers" command that needs individual-module-level detail. To make things easier for new codepaths working with the new-style provider installer, here we introduce a new model type getproviders.Requirements which is based on the type the new installer was already taking as its input. We have new methods in the states, configs, and earlyconfig packages to produce values of this type, and a helper to merge Requirements together so we can combine config-derived and state-derived requirements together during installation. The advantage of this new model over the moduledeps one is that all of recursive module walking is done up front and we produce a simple, flat structure that is more convenient for the main use-cases of selecting providers for installation and then finding providers in the local cache to use them for other operations. This new model is _not_ suitable for implementing "terraform providers" because it does not retain module-specific requirement details. Therefore we will likely keep using moduledeps for "terraform providers" for now, and then possibly at a later time consider specializing the moduledeps logic for only what "terraform providers" needs, because it seems to be the only use-case that needs to retain that level of detail.	6 years ago
Martin Atkins	86f0b5191c	addrs: Stronger validation and normalization of provider namespace/type ... The provider FQN is becoming our primary identifier for a provider, so it's important that we are clear about the equality rules for these addresses and what characters are valid within them. We previously had a basic regex permitting ASCII letters and digits for validation and no normalization at all. We need to do at least case folding and UTF-8 normalization because these names will appear in file and directory names in case-insensitive filesystems and in repository names such as on GitHub. Since we're already using DNS-style normalization and validation rules for the hostname part, rather than defining an entirely new set of rules here we'll just treat the provider namespace and type as if they were single labels in a DNS name. Aside from some internal consistency, that also works out nicely because systems like GitHub use organization and repository names as part of hostnames (e.g. with GitHub Pages) and so tend to apply comparable constraints themselves. This introduces the possibility of names containing letters from alphabets other than the latin alphabet, and for latin letters with diacritics. That's consistent with our introduction of similar support for identifiers in the language in Terraform 0.12, and is intended to be more friendly to Terraform users throughout the world that might prefer to name their products using a different alphabet. This is also a further justification for using the DNS normalization rules: modern companies tend to choose product names that make good domain names, and now such names will be usable as Terraform provider names too.	6 years ago
Kristin Laemmert	7eed30595a	moduledeps: replace ProviderInstance with addrs.Provider (#24017) ... * addrs: add ParseProviderSourceString function to parse fqns from tfconfig-inspect * moduledeps: use addrs.Provider instead of ProviderInstance	6 years ago
Kristin Laemmert	18dd1bb4d6	Mildwonkey/tfconfig upgrade (#23670) ... * deps: bump terraform-config-inspect library * configs: parse `version` in new required_providers block With the latest version of `terraform-config-inspect`, the required_providers attribute can now be a string or an object with attributes "source" and "version". This change allows parsing the version constraint from the new object while ignoring any given source attribute.	6 years ago
Justin Downing	1e32ae243c	grammatical updates to comments and docs (#20195)	7 years ago
Martin Atkins	86c02d5c35	command: "terraform init" can partially initialize for 0.12upgrade ... There are a few constructs from 0.11 and prior that cause 0.12 parsing to fail altogether, which previously created a chicken/egg problem because we need to install the providers in order to run "terraform 0.12upgrade" and thus fix the problem. This changes "terraform init" to use the new "early configuration" loader for module and provider installation. This is built on the more permissive parser in the terraform-config-inspect package, and so it allows us to read out the top-level blocks from the configuration while accepting legacy HCL syntax. In the long run this will let us do version compatibility detection before attempting a "real" config load, giving us better error messages for any future syntax additions, but in the short term the key thing is that it allows us to install the dependencies even if the configuration isn't fully valid. Because backend init still requires full configuration, this introduces a new mode of terraform init where it detects heuristically if it seems like we need to do a configuration upgrade and does a partial init if so, before finally directing the user to run "terraform 0.12upgrade" before running any other commands. The heuristic here is based on two assumptions: - If the "early" loader finds no errors but the normal loader does, the configuration is likely to be valid for Terraform 0.11 but not 0.12. - If there's already a version constraint in the configuration that excludes Terraform versions prior to v0.12 then the configuration is probably _already_ upgraded and so it's just a normal syntax error, even if the early loader didn't detect it. Once the upgrade process is removed in 0.13.0 (users will be required to go stepwise 0.11 -> 0.12 -> 0.13 to upgrade after that), some of this can be simplified to remove that special mode, but the idea of doing the dependency version checks against the liberal parser will remain valuable to increase our chances of reporting version-based incompatibilities rather than syntax errors as we add new features in future.	7 years ago
Martin Atkins	8ca1fcec51	internal/earlyconfig: Liberal config parsing for init ... This is an alternative to the full config loader in the "configs" package that is good for "early" use-cases like "terraform init", where we want to find out what our dependencies are without getting tripped up on any other errors that might be present.	7 years ago