4 Commits (4cffff24b1d1e0af43aed445e411f4e9cc6e6238)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Chris Arcand	74e087dc29	Rename cloud.testBackendDefault -> cloud.testBackendWithName	5 years ago
Chris Arcand	d2b6b5f2b3	cloud: Align local and remote workspace name with 'name' strategy ... This changes the 'name' strategy to always align the local configured workspace name and the remote Terraform Cloud workspace, rather than the implicit use of the 'default' unnamed workspace being used instead. What this essentially means is that the Cloud integration does not fully support workspaces when configured for a single TFC workspace (as was the case with the 'remote' backend), but *does* use the backend.Workspaces() interface to allow for normal local behaviors like terraform.workspace to resolve to the correct name. It does this by always setting the local workspace name when the 'name' strategy is used, as a part of initialization. Part of the diff here is exporting all the previously unexported types for mapping workspaces. The command package (and init in particular) needs to be able to handle setting the local workspace in this particular scenario.	5 years ago
Chris Arcand	471dd479e8	Update go-tfe to 26689e ... These changes include additions to fulfill the interface for the client mock, plus moving all that logic (which needn't be duplicated across both the remote and cloud packages) over to the cloud package under a dedicated mock client file.	5 years ago
Chris Arcand	ea8ad0b15a	Initial commit of 'cloud' package ... The cloud package intends to implement a new integration for Terraform Cloud/Enterprise. The purpose of this integration is to better support TFC users; it will shed some overly generic UX and architecture, behavior changes that are otherwise backwards incompatible in the remote backend, and technical debt - all of which are vestiges from before Terraform Cloud existed. This initial commit is largely a porting of the existing 'remote' backend, which will serve as an underlying implementation detail and not be a typical user-level backend. This is because to re-implement the literal backend interface is orthogonal to the purpose of this integration, and can always be migrated away from later. As this backend is considered an implementation detail, it will not be registered as a declarable backend. Within these changes it is, for easy of initial development and a clean diff.	5 years ago