7 Commits (2c125d7952e54488f39be7e2018a8a5ba0f1f562)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Bruno Schaatsbergen	098234e244	states: check root output value changes in refresh-only mode (#35812) ... * check root output values when determining plan applicability in refresh mode In refresh-only mode, we do not anticipate proposing any actions; however, a plan is marked as “applyable” if there are changes in the state between runs. Currently, a plan is considered “applyable” only when there are differences in managed resources. This approach seems to overlook changes in root output values. As a result, a plan can be marked as non-applyable, even when there are changes in the root output value, due to the lack of detected changes since only managed resources were checked. * set 'applyable' to true	2 years ago
Martin Atkins	884e1fb2a4	terraform: Plans can be "complete" and "applyable" ... These ideas are both already implied by some logic elsewhere in the system, but until now we didn't have the decision logic centralized in a single place that could therefore evolve over time without necessarily always updating every caller together. We'll now have the modules runtime produce its own boolean ruling about each characteristic, which callers can rely on for the mechanical decision-making of whether to offer the user an "approve" prompt, and whether to remind the user after apply that it was an incomplete plan that will probably therefore need at least one more plan/apply round to converge. The "Applyable" flag directly replaces the previous method Plan.CanApply, with equivalent logic. Making this a field instead of a method means that we can freeze it as part of a saved plan, rather than recalculating it when we reload the plan, and we can export the field value in our export formats like JSON while ensuring it'll always be consistent with what Terraform is using internally. Callers can (and should) still use other context in the plan to return more tailored messages for specific situations they already know about that might be useful to users, but with these flags as a baseline callers can now just fall back to a generic presentation when encountering a situation they don't yet understand, rather than making the wrong decision and causing something strange to happen. That is: a lack of awareness of a new rule will now cause just a generic message in the UI, rather than incorrect behavior. This commit mostly just deals with populating the flags, and then all of the direct consequences of that on our various tests. Further changes to actually make use of these flags elsewhere in the system will follow in later commits, both in this repository and in other repositories.	2 years ago
James Bardin	8655b08b19	fix sensitive_attributes in test ... Add the missing sensitive_attributes to the test state, and update the output to reflect the new `"checks"` attribute name.	2 years ago
Liam Cervante	14123e277c	Include sensitive metadata from the schema when building the json state output (#33059) ... * include sensitive metadata from the schema when building the json state output * found another test case	3 years ago
Alisdair McDiarmid	12c8f9498c	json-output: Add output type to JSON format ... Previously the supported JSON plan and state formats included only serialized output values, which was a lossy serialization of the Terraform type system. This commit adds a type field in the usual cty JSON format, which allows reconstitution of the original value. For example, previously a list(string) and a set(string) containing the same values were indistinguishable. This change serializes these as follows: { "value": ["a","b","c"], "type": ["list","string"] } and: { "value": ["a","b","c"], "type": ["set","string"] }	4 years ago
Alisdair McDiarmid	bb35f02c95	Conclude preconditions/postconditions experiment	4 years ago
Alisdair McDiarmid	c5d10bdef1	core: Store condition block results in plan ... In order to include condition block results in the JSON plan output, we must store them in the plan and its serialization. Terraform can evaluate condition blocks multiple times, so we must be able to update the result. Accordingly, the plan.Conditions object is a map with keys representing the condition block's address. Condition blocks are not referenceable in any other context, so this address form cannot be used anywhere in the configuration. The commit includes a new test case for the JSON output of a refresh-only plan, which is currently the only way for a failing condition result to be rendered through this path.	4 years ago