You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
gnucash/doc/html/C/xacc-apprdepr.html

717 lines
20 KiB

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" title="normal" type="text/css" href=
"gnucash.css">
<title>Depreciation and Capital Gains</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1> Depreciation and Capital Gains</h1>
<p> This section provides a treatment of the handling of
depreciation and appreciation of assets in GnuCash.</p>
<p> It also provides a brief introduction to the related tax
issues.</p>
<p> <b> Warning:</b> <em>Be aware that different countries can
have <b> substantially</b> different tax policies for handling
these things; all that this document can really provide is some
of the underlying ideas to help you apply your "favorite"
tax/depreciation policies.</em></p>
<p> Note that appreciation and depreciation of assets tend to
be treated somewhat differently:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="#depr"> Depreciation</a> is <em> usually</em>
recognized (the technical term is <b> accrued</b>) as an
expense on an ongoing basis, gradually reducing the value
of an asset towards zero.
<p> Depreciation tends to only get calculated on assets
that are used for professional or business purposes, because
governments
don't generally allow you to claim depreciation deductions
on personal assets, and it's pointless to bother with the
procedure if it's not deductible. </p>
</li>
<li>
In contrast, <a href="#appr"> Capital Gains,</a> which
could be called <em>asset value appreciation,</em> are
typically <em> not</em> recognized until some time down the
road when the asset is sold, and at that <em> instant,</em>
the entire gain becomes income.
<p> Unlike depreciation, governments tend to be <em> quite
interested</em> in taxing capital gains in one manner or
another.</p>
<p> (As always, there are exceptions. If you hold a bond
that pays all of its interest at maturity, tax authorities
will often require that you recognize interest each year,
and refuse this to be treated as a capital gain. The
phrases <em>accrued interest,</em> or <em> imputed
interest</em> are often there to scare those that are
sensitive to such things...)</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h1>Capital Gains - Asset Appreciation</h1>
<a name="appr"></a>
<p>Appreciation of assets is, in general, a fairly tricky matter
to deal with. This is so because, for some sorts of assets, it
is difficult to correctly estimate an increase in value <em>
until you actually sell the asset.</em></p>
<p> If you invest in <a href="xacc-ticker.html">securities</a>
that are traded on a daily basis on open markets such as stock
exchanges, prices may be quite exact, and selling the asset at
market prices may be as simple as calling a broker and issuing
a <b> Market Order.</b></p>
<p> On the other hand, homes in your neighborhood are sold
somewhat less often, such sales tend to involve expending
considerable effort, and involve negotiations, which means that
estimates are likely to be less precise. Similarly, selling a
used automobile involves a negotiation process that makes
pricing a bit less predictable.</p>
<p> Harder to estimate are values of collectible objects such
as jewelry, works of art, baseball cards, and "Beanie Babies."
The markets for such objects are somewhat less open than the
securities markets.</p>
<p> Worse still are one-of-a-kind assets. Factories often
contain presses and dies customized to build a very specific
product that cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars;
this equipment may be <em>worthless</em> outside of that very
specific context. In such cases, there several conflicting
values might be attached to the asset, <em>none</em> of them
unambiguously correct.</p>
<p> Let's suppose you buy an asset expected to increase in
value, say a Degas painting, and want to track this. (The
insurance company will care about this, even if nobody else
does.)</p>
<p> Properly tracking the continually-increasing value of the
Degas will require at least three, quite possibly the following
four accounts (plus a bank or cash account where the money for
the purchase comes from):</p>
<ul>
<li>An <em>Asset Cost</em> asset account to track the
original cost of the painting,</li>
<li>An <em>Accrued Unrealized Gains on Asset</em> asset
account to keep track of increases in value, and</li>
<li>An <em>Accrued Gain On Asset Income</em> income account
in which to record the income side of the annual gains in
your riches, and</li>
<li>A <em>Realized Gain On Asset Income</em> income account
in which to record the realized income when you sell the
asset.</li>
</ul>
<p> The <em>accrued gains</em> likely won't affect your taxable
income for <em> income</em> tax purposes, although it could
have some effect on <em> property</em> taxes.</p>
<h2>The handling of capital gains in GnuCash</h2>
<h3> The Acquisition</h3>
<p>The first thing you have to do is to create the <em>asset
cost account</em>, then transfer the sum you paid for this
painting from your bank account to this asset account to record
the purchase.</p>
<p> A month later, you have reason to suspect that the value of
your painting has increased by $1200. In order to record this
you transfer $1200 from your <em>accrued gains on asset</em>
income account to your asset account.</p>
<p>Your main window will resemble this:</p>
<img src="appr-main1.gif" alt=
"Main window after purchase and appreciation">
<p>and your asset account will resemble this:</p>
<img src="appr-asset1.gif" alt=
"Asset account after purchase and appreciation">
<h3> While You Hold the Asset</h3>
<p>Asset appreciation is a sort of income but it is <em>
not</em> cash in hand.</p>
<p> The people that got "rich" in 1999 from IPOs of
Linux-related companies like Red Hat Software and VA Linux
Systems could verify this. They hold options or stock that are
<em> theoretically</em> valued at millions of dollars USD.</p>
<p> That doesn't mean that they are actually millionaires; the
principal participants have to hold their stock for at least
six months before selling <em> any</em> of it. The fact that
they <em>can't</em> sell it means that while it may in theory
be worth millions of dollars on paper, there is, as of late
1999, no way for them to legally <em> get</em> those
millions.</p>
<h3> Selling the Asset</h3>
<p>Let&acute;s say another month later prices for Degas
paintings have gone up some more, in your case about $2500, you
estimate. You duly record these $2500 as an income like above,
then decide to sell the painting.</p>
<p>Now there arise three possibilities:</p>
<ol>
<li>
Your optimistic estimate of the painting&acute;s value was
correct.
<p> The income account is left alone (or perhaps gets
transferred from an <em> Accrued Gain</em> income to a <em>
Realized Gain</em> income account), and the recording is
rather like:</p>
<table summary="BIGGAIN">
<tr>
<th>Account</th>
<th>Amount</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cash</td>
<td>$16055</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Painting</td>
<td>-$11000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Realized Gain Income</td>
<td>-$5055</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p> And if any amounts had been accrued as <em> Accrued
Gains,</em> the asset amount should be closed out, offset
by a <em> negative</em> value for <em> Accrued Gain</em>
income. If the total that had been accrued was $5000, then
the transaction might look like the following:</p>
<table summary="BIGGAINACCRUEDTOO">
<tr>
<th>Account</th>
<th>Amount</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cash</td>
<td>$16055</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Painting</td>
<td>-$11000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accrued Gain Asset</td>
<td>-$5000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Realized Gain Income</td>
<td>-$5055</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accrued Gain Income</td>
<td>$5000</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p> Note that the two income accounts offset one another so
that the <em> current</em> income resulting from the
transaction is only $55. The remaining $5000 had previously
been recognized as <em> Accrued Gain Income.</em></p>
</li>
<li>
You were over-optimistic about the value of the painting.
<p> Instead of the $16055 you thought the painting was
worth are only offered $15000. But you still decide to
sell, because you value $15000 more than you value the
painting.</p>
<p> The numbers change a little bit, but not too
dramatically.</p>
<table summary="SMALLGAINACCRUEDTOO">
<tr>
<th>Account</th>
<th>Amount</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cash</td>
<td>$15000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Painting</td>
<td>-$11000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accrued Gain Asset</td>
<td>-$5000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Realized Gain Income</td>
<td>-$4000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accrued Gain Income</td>
<td>$5000</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p> Note that the two income accounts offset one another so
that the <em> current</em> income resulting from the
transaction turns out to be a <em> loss</em> of $1000.
That's fine, as you had previously recognized $5000 in
income.</p>
</li>
<li>
You manage to sell your painting for more than you thought
in your wildest dreams.
<p> The extra value is, again, recorded as a gain, <em>
i.e.</em> an income.</p>
<table summary="HUGEGAIN">
<tr>
<th>Account</th>
<th>Amount</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cash</td>
<td>$50000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Painting</td>
<td>-$11000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accrued Gain Asset</td>
<td>-$5000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Realized Gain Income</td>
<td>-$39000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accrued Gain Income</td>
<td>$5000</td>
</tr>
</table>
</li>
</ol>
<p> In practice, it truly is important to keep the <em> Accrued
Gain Income</em> separate from the <em> Realized Gain
Income,</em> as the former is likely to be ignored by your tax
authorities, who will only care to charge you on the <em>
Realized Gain.</em></p>
<p>Below, we show the second case discussed.</p>
<img src="appr-main2.gif" alt="Main window after sale"><br
clear="ALL">
<img src="appr-asset2.gif" alt="Asset account after sale">
<h2>Caution about Valuation</h2>
<p>As we see in this example, for non-financial assets, it may
be difficult to correctly estimate the ``true'' value of an
asset.</p>
<p> It is quite easy to count yourself rich based on
questionable estimates that do not reflect "money in the
bank."</p>
<p> Thus, when dealing with appreciation of assets,</p>
<ol>
<li>
Be careful with your estimation of values.
<p> Do not indulge in wishful thinking.</p>
</li>
<li>
Never, ever, count on money you do not have in your bank or
as cash.
<p> Until you have actually sold your asset and got the
money, any numbers on paper (or magnetic patterns on your
hard disk) are merely that.</p>
<p> If you could realistically convince a banker to lend
you money, using the assets as collateral, that is a pretty
reasonable evidence that the assets have value, as lenders
are professionally suspicious of dubious overestimations of
value.</p>
<p> Be aware: all too many companies that appear
"profitable" on paper go out of business as a result of
running out of <em> cash,</em> precisely because "valuable
assets" were not the same thing as cash.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<h2>Taxation of Capital Gains</h2>
<p> Taxation policies vary considerably between countries, so
it is virtually impossible to say anything that will be
universally useful.</p>
<p> However, it is <em> common</em> for income generated by
capital gains to not be subject to taxation until the date that
the asset is actually sold, and sometimes not even then.</p>
<p> North American home owners <em> usually</em> find that when
they sell personal residences, capital gains that occur are
exempt from taxation. It appears that other countries treat
sale of homes differently, taxing people on such gains. German
authorities, for example, tax those gains only if you owned the
property for less than ten years.</p>
<p> <a href="mailto:cbbrowne@hex.net"> I have</a> one story
from my professional tax preparation days where a family sold a
farm, and expected a <em>considerable</em> tax bill that turned
out to be virtually nil due to having owned the property before
1971 (wherein lies a critical "Valuation Day" date in Canada)
and due to it being a <em> dairy</em> farm, with some <em>
really peculiar</em> resulting deductions.</p>
<p> In short, this presentation is fairly simple, but taxation
often gets terribly complicated...</p>
<h1>Depreciation of assets</h1>
<a name="depr"></a>
<p>Compared to the often uncertain estimates one has to do
where appreciation of assets is concerned, we are on somewhat
firmer ground here.</p>
<ul>
<li>Governments tend to set up precise rules as to how you
are required to calculate depreciation for tax purposes.</li>
<li>It is easy to look up in references such as "Blue Books"
estimates of what an automobile should be worth after 3 years
of use.</li>
</ul>
<p> Since depreciation of assets is very often driven by tax
policies, the discussion of depreciation will focus in that
direction, on some of the more common depreciation calculation
schemes.</p>
<p> While there has been some discussion about how to
accomplish automated calculation and creation of transactions
to handle things like depreciation, there is not yet any
working code, so for now, you will have to do calculations by
hand.</p>
<h2>Depreciation schemes</h2>
<h3>Linear depreciation</h3>
<p> Linear depreciation diminishes the value of an asset by a
fixed amount each period until the net value is zero. This is
the <em>simplest</em> calculation, as you estimate a useful
lifetime, and simply divide the cost equally across that
lifetime.</p>
<p><b>Example:</b> You have bought a computer for $1500 and
wish to depreciate it over a period of 5 years. Each year the
amount of depreciation is $300, leading to the following
calculations:<br clear="ALL">
</p>
<table summary="Example 1">
<tr>
<th>Year</th>
<th>Depreciation</th>
<th>Remaining Value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>300</td>
<td>1200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>300</td>
<td>900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>300</td>
<td>600</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>300</td>
<td>300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>300</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>Geometric Depreciation</h3>
<p>Each period the asset is depreciated by a fixed percentage
of its value in the previous period. In this scheme the rest
value of an asset decreases exponentially leaving a value at
the end that is larger than zero (<em> i.e.</em> - a resale
value).</p>
<p> <em> Beware: Tax authorities may require (or allow) a
larger percentage in the first period.</em> On the other hand,
in Canada, this is reversed, as they permit only a <em>
half</em> share of "Capital Cost Allowance" in the first
year.</p>
<p> The result of this approach is that asset value decreases
more rapidly at the beginning than at the end which is <em>
probably</em> more realistic for most assets than a linear
scheme. This is certainly true for automobiles.</p>
<p><strong>Example:</strong> We take the same example as above,
with an annual depreciation of 30%.</p>
<table summary="Example 2">
<tr>
<th>Year</th>
<th>Depreciation</th>
<th>Remaining Value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>450</td>
<td>1050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>315</td>
<td>735</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>220.50</td>
<td>514.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>154.35</td>
<td>360.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>108.05</td>
<td>252.10</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>Sum of digits</h3>
<p>A third method most often employed in Anglo/Saxon countries
is the "sum of digits" method. Here is an illustration:</p>
<p><strong>Example:</strong> First you divide the asset value
by the sum of the years of use, <em> e.g.</em> for our example
from above with an asset worth $1500 that is used over a period
of five years you get 1500/(1+2+3+4+5)=100. Depreciation and
asset value are then calculated as follows:</p>
<table summary="Example 3">
<tr>
<th>Year</th>
<th>Depreciation</th>
<th>Remaining Value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>100*5=500</td>
<td>1000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>100*4=400</td>
<td>600</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>100*3=300</td>
<td>300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>100*2=200</td>
<td>100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>100*1=100</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h2>The handling of depreciation in gnucash</h2>
<p>In order to keep track of the depreciation of an asset, you
need :</p>
<ul>
<li>An <em>Asset Cost</em> asset account to keep track of the
original value;</li>
<li>An <em> Accumulated Depreciation</em> asset account in
which to collect the sum of all of the years' depreciation
amounts;</li>
<li>A <em>Depreciation Expense</em> expense account in which
to record periodic depreciation expenses.</li>
</ul>
<p>The first step, again, is to record the purchase of your
asset by transferring the money from bank bank account to the
<em>asset cost</em> account. Afterwards, in each accounting
period you record the depreciation as an expense in the
appropriate account.</p>
<p>The two windows below show your asset account and the main
window after the third year of depreciation using a "sum of
digits" scheme for the example above.</p>
<img src="depr-asset.gif" alt=
"Asset account after depreciation"><br clear="ALL">
<img src="depr-main.gif" alt="Main window after depreciation">
<h2>A word of caution</h2>
<p>Since depreciation and tax issues are closely related, you
may not always be free in choosing your preferred method. Fixing
wrong calculations will cost a whole lot more time and trouble
than getting the calculations right the first time, so if you
plan to depreciate assets, it is wise to make sure of the
schemes you will be permitted <em> or required</em> to use.</p>
<p> Return to <a href="xacc-main.html"> Main Documentation
Page.</a></p>
</body>
</html>